What Is the Going Price Paid for Aborted Baby Brains?

Republicans on the special Firm panel investigating the transfer of fetal tissue from aborted babies will present evidence in a hearing today that breaks down the toll per body part.

With release of this evidence, Republicans say, they have enough documentation to show that several abortion clinics and middleman procurement businesses may take violated federal constabulary.

"It is but horrifying," Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., who leads the Business firm'due south investigation of the fetal tissue industry, told The Daily Signal. "They are putting a dollar value on these organs from these children—unborn children that have been aborted. It is simply beyond conventionalities."

According to Republicans involved in the investigation, a researcher paid a middleman procurement company $three,340 for a fetal brain, $595 for a "infant skull matched to upper and lower limbs," and $890 for "upper and lower limbs with hands and feet."

Middleman procurement businesses are companies that obtain tissue and other body parts from aborted babies and provide them to institutions or other organizations for research. Under federal law, the transportation of fetal tissue is based on a nonprofit model.

The committee's documents, which volition be used today in a House hearing on the pricing of fetal tissue, include payments made from a middleman procurement company to an abortion clinic on a monthly basis. Those dollar amounts range from $6,010 to $xi,365.

Over the bridge of a year, i research institution paid a middleman company $42,535 to obtain 38 fetal brains, 12 fetal hearts, three fetal upper/lower limbs, five fetal livers, and 12 fetal pancreases, co-ordinate to the select House panel's documents.

The Select Investigative Panel on Babe Lives, equally it is formally known, was created on Oct. 7, 2015, when the House passed a resolution calling for a full and consummate investigation regarding the medical practices of abortion service providers and the business practices of the procurement organizations that sell fetal tissue.

In the most recent documents beingness released, the panel did non publicly identify companies or individuals involved in the transactions "out of an abundance of caution," Blackburn told The Daily Signal in a telephone interview prior to the hearing.

Because the documents were highly redacted, The Daily Signal was unable to independently ostend the prices of each body part.

Withal, the console announced earlier this twelvemonth that information technology was issuing subpoenas to companies and organizations that refused to cooperate with the investigation. Those groups included StemExpress, Ganogen, Biomedical Inquiry Institute of America, the University of New Mexico, and Southwestern Women's Options.

Democrats on the select panel have called the investigation a "witch chase" past Blackburn and other Republicans who oppose abortion.

As The Daily Indicate has previously reported, Democrats have condemned the panel'south investigators for requesting the names of doctors, medical students, researchers, and others involved in the abortion and fetal tissue procurement industries, arguing that obtaining those names could make the panel "complicit in physical assaults or murders of these people."

Only with the imminent release of the next round of prove, Blackburn said she is hopeful Democrats "volition recognize that we are taking every possible precaution and doing our best to fulfill the requirement that Congress has made of us."

The 1993 National Institutes of Health Revitalization Deed prohibits profiting from the sale of any fetal tissue. However, information technology is legal to provide and accept payment to cover reasonable costs for "transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue."

Amidst documents uncovered in the investigation is an image of a procurement visitor marketing itself to abortion clinics every bit "financially profitable." The name of that company besides was redacted.

Source: U.S. House Select Investigative Panel

Questions about whether abortion clinics and middleman procurement companies profit from transactions involving trunk parts and other fetal tissue from aborted babies were raised later on a series of videos published last twelvemonth. The hidden-camera videos showed officials at Planned Parenthood affiliates discussing the buying and selling of fetal tissue with a middleman company, StemExpress.

Cate Dyer, founder of StemExpress, told The New York Times in July that her visitor "obtained fetal tissue in accord with the rules fabricated by ideals boards at the institutions ownership information technology."

In that article, Dyer likewise was quoted as saying the procedure of obtaining fetal cells is "hard," "expensive," and takes "millions of dollars of equipment."

Planned Parenthood Federation of America consistently has denied any wrongdoing and was cleared in multiple country investigations. In October, after facing questions about its fetal tissue donation practices, Planned Parenthood appear it would no longer accept any reimbursement as part of its tissue donation program.

During today's hearing, chosen "The Pricing of Fetal Tissue," Republicans were expected to call Brian Patrick Lennon, a former assistant U.Due south. attorney from Michigan, to testify as a witness.

In his written testimony, released in accelerate, Lennon argues that based on the evidence, an "upstanding federal prosecutor could establish probable cause that both the abortion clinics and the procurement business violated the [federal] statute (42 U.South.C. § 289g-2), aided and abetted ane another in violating the statute (xviii U.S.C. § ii), and likely conspired together to violate the statute (18 U.South.C. § 371)."

Republicans also were scheduled to hear testimony from Michael Norton, a former U.Due south. attorney for the country of Colorado; Catherine Glenn Foster, acquaintance scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Constitute and CEO and general counsel at Sound Legal; and Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., who is pro-life, among others.

Democrats were slated to bring in Fay Clayton, a lawyer who formerly represented the Anatomical Gift Foundation, a nonprofit corporation that provided donated tissue to medical researchers.

In her prepared argument, Clayton criticizes Republicans for "using [the console's] subpoena power to compel testimony from wellness care providers and medical researchers" and for declining to subpoena David Daleiden, founder of the Heart for Medical Progress, the pro-life group behind the string of undercover videos targeting Planned Parenthood.

"The fact that the select console has been using its subpoena ability to compel testimony from wellness care providers and medical researchers—who accept better things to do with their fourth dimension than Mr. Daleiden does—suggests the panel is non genuinely interested in public policy at all," Clayton says in the written statement.

Democrats also were ready to hear from Robert Raben, president and founder of the Raben Group, a progressive policy group, and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., a pro-selection lawmaker.

Witnesses likely will be asked to answer to Blackburn and other panel members who, the chairman said, "believe that information technology is more than likely that payments to the abortion clinics and to the procurement businesses accept exceeded reasonable cost."

What Is the Going Price Paid for Aborted Baby Brains?

Source: https://www.dailysignal.com/2016/04/20/in-the-market-for-fetal-body-parts-a-babys-brain-sells-for-3340/